Matthew Woodcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I have a question: whydo we have to keep .adb files in the package
>> since .ads files are meant to contain the interface? (well, indeed
>> except from generics).
>
> I don't know that we 'have to', but one reason to do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a question: whydo we have to keep .adb files in the package
> since .ads files are meant to contain the interface? (well, indeed
> except from generics).
I don't know that we 'have to', but one reason to do so is that gnat can
inline subprograms across unit bou
Matthew Woodcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ian Sharpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Is there a Debian-preferred location for .ali files (etc) produced by
>>the Gnat Ada compiler? The pattern seems to be:
>>
>> .a/.so files in /usr/lib
>> .ali files in /usr/lib/xxx
>> .ads/.adb files in /usr
Ian Sharpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there a Debian-preferred location for .ali files (etc) produced by
>the Gnat Ada compiler? The pattern seems to be:
>
> .a/.so files in /usr/lib
> .ali files in /usr/lib/xxx
> .ads/.adb files in /usr/include/xxx
>
>where xxx is the package that the libra
David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 10:47:54PM +0100, Ian Sharpe wrote:
>> Is there a Debian-preferred location for .ali files (etc) produced by
>> the Gnat Ada compiler? The pattern seems to be:
>>
>> .a/.so files in /usr/lib
>> .ali files in /usr/lib/xxx
>> .
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 10:47:54PM +0100, Ian Sharpe wrote:
> Is there a Debian-preferred location for .ali files (etc) produced by
> the Gnat Ada compiler? The pattern seems to be:
>
> .a/.so files in /usr/lib
> .ali files in /usr/lib/xxx
> .ads/.adb files in /usr/include/xxx
>
> where xxx i
6 matches
Mail list logo