Re: Vancouver hierarchy - proposed terminology

2005-03-16 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:56:03PM +, Henning Makholm wrote: >>An IRREGULAR architecture either does not make releases, or release >>according to a schedule that does not match the REGULAR one. (One >>possible instance of this is "we'll tr

Re: Vancouver hierarchy - proposed terminology

2005-03-16 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:56:03PM +, Henning Makholm wrote: > The debate is being hard to follow, with tiers, classes of citizenship > and several other distinctions being tossed about, and not always > clearly mapped to a particular one of the two divisions in the plan. > I propose the follow

Re: Vancouver hierarchy - proposed terminology

2005-03-16 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On 20050315T215603+, Henning Makholm wrote: > (Or, as alternative alternative terminology: > Widespread -> "utlanning" > Narrowspread regular -> "framling" > Irregular-> "ramen" > Other unix-like OSes -> "varelse" > Microsoft Windows-> "djur" > ) Heh, second