On 2/21/06, Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You probably missed this question, which I also wanted to ask:
>
Frank forwarded it to me, and I replied to him in person -- here's the reply.
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 03:55:23PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> > "Scott James Remnant" <[EMA
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 12:11:00AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > But afaik, you don't actually have access to that since it's on a
> > restricted access machine, so I'm at a loss as to what you're calling
> > "Debian's morgue".
> Merkel's
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
> But afaik, you don't actually have access to that since it's on a
> restricted access machine, so I'm at a loss as to what you're calling
> "Debian's morgue".
Merkel's mirror, most probably.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One d
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:06:47PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> * Processing netbase
>- unstable: 4.24
>- main: 4.23ubuntu4
>- testing: 4.24
>- stable: 4.21
>- oldstable: 4.07
>- morgue: 4.22
> So the reason it didn't use 4.23 was simply t
You probably missed this question, which I also wanted to ask:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 03:55:23PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> "Scott James Remnant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And the reason 4.23 isn't in the morgue is simple, Debian's morgue ran
>> out of disk space a while ago.
> What is De
also sprach Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.21.1643 +0100]:
> Launchpad does allow e-mail submission of support tickets and
> bugs, but only if your e-mail address is registered against
> a Launchpad account. I believe this is because they think it's
> the best way to avoid spam (
On 2/21/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.21.1506 +0100]:
> > File a request here:
> > https://launchpad.net/products/nda/+addticket
>
> This isn't a rant, but a serious wishlist request: if Canonical
> wants more coope
also sprach Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.21.1506 +0100]:
> File a request here:
> https://launchpad.net/products/nda/+addticket
Scott, I appreciate your work and your mail to keep us up to date.
It's good to see you back at the keys!
This isn't a rant, but a serious wishli
"Scott James Remnant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And the reason 4.23 isn't in the morgue is simple, Debian's morgue ran
> out of disk space a while ago.
What is Debian's morgue? What about using snapshot.debian.net?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Foldi
Scripsit Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The problem is that you are both looking at the process in reverse. As I
> explained, Ubuntu imports a subset of bugs from the Debian bug tracking
> system, and those are the bugs which are relevant to the process I
> described.
You make it sound lik
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 07:29:24PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The only distinction here is between merely publishing the patches on our
> > website, and pushing the patch to the Debian maintainer immediately. We
> > publish all of our patches
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 07:29:24PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> Um, so these patches, are they bugfixes?
Not necessarily, many of Ubuntu patches are just enhancements that _could_
be made in Debian. See for example http://bugs.debian.org/246935, they
might or might not have the corres
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 07:55:38AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> If you ask me I would immediately subscribe to all of my packages and
> I would not consider it as noise if any patch Ububtu is doing would be
> sended automatically as wishlist bug to the Debian BTS.
If you browse through the patch
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 07:55:38AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> >for use elsewhere. In the future, we intend to offer a subscription
> >mechanism for interested parties to receive asynchronous notification of
> >new
> >patches and other activity, b
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
for use elsewhere. In the future, we intend to offer a subscription
mechanism for interested parties to receive asynchronous notification of new
patches and other activity, but until that time, we are taking a
If you ask me I would immediately subscribe t
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 03:02:32AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Then I'm having trouble parsing what you are saying, too. Like
> Thomas, the only sense I can make of your description is that
> you are are describing an algorithm that goes roughly like
>
> 0 Bug is discovered
> 1 Patch
Scripsit Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 06:43:45PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Many Debian maintainers would consider this unwelcome noise. In
>> > cases where we can be certain that this is welcome (i.e., a bu
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 11:31:01PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
>
> > These seem like excellent fodder for a FAQ/wiki, if there isn't one
> > already (a quick scan around Ubuntu's official and wiki FAQs didn't turn
> > up anything). Perhaps "How Ubuntu
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 11:31:01PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> These seem like excellent fodder for a FAQ/wiki, if there isn't one
> already (a quick scan around Ubuntu's official and wiki FAQs didn't turn
> up anything). Perhaps "How Ubuntu relates to Debian", or "How Ubuntu
> changes find the
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:32:54 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> The only distinction here is between merely publishing the patches on our
>> website, and pushing the patch to the Debian maintainer immediately. We
>> publish all of our patches rela
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The only distinction here is between merely publishing the patches on our
> website, and pushing the patch to the Debian maintainer immediately. We
> publish all of our patches relative to Debian on a regular basis, and make
> an honest effort to sort
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The only distinction here is between merely publishing the patches on our
> website, and pushing the patch to the Debian maintainer immediately. We
> publish all of our patches relative to Debian on a regular basis, and make
> an honest effort to sort
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 07:04:04PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> So can you explain what I'm misunderstanding? What sort of patches
> are we talking about, and what is the publishing you're talking about?
The only distinction here is between merely publishing the patches on our
website, an
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 06:43:45PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Many Debian maintainers would consider this unwelcome noise. In cases
> > > where
> > > we can be certain that this is welcome
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 06:43:45PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Many Debian maintainers would consider this unwelcome noise. In cases where
> > we can be certain that this is welcome (i.e., a bug is open in debbugs), the
> > patch is pushed, o
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 12:28:36AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > One suggestion: if any Ubuntu patches were CC'd to the Debian
> > maintainer, or filed in the BTS, they would get applied quicker. I've
> > now put your gimp-print changes back into my
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 12:28:36AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> One suggestion: if any Ubuntu patches were CC'd to the Debian
> maintainer, or filed in the BTS, they would get applied quicker. I've
> now put your gimp-print changes back into my packages, but I would
> have been happy to do this la
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Many Debian developers have been asking for a simple way to see the
> current difference between their package and the equivalent in Ubuntu,
> if any.
>
> http://people.ubuntu.com/~scott/patches/
That
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 08:46:25AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:36:42PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > That helps a lot, thanks Scott! What about offering a way to subscribe
> > to packages, so you'll get informed by mail if a package in Ubuntu is
> > changed, may
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:36:42PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> That helps a lot, thanks Scott! What about offering a way to subscribe
> to packages, so you'll get informed by mail if a package in Ubuntu is
> changed, maybe with an interdiff applied to that mail?
This isn't possible yet, bu
* Scott James Remnant wrote:
> Ubuntu developers have been asking for patches to be updated when a
> new Ubuntu upload is made, not just when a new Debian upload is
> made.
>
> Hand me that rock, I've a couple of birds to kill ...
>
> http://people.ubuntu.com/~scott/patches/
>
> At this URL, you
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:03:17PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 21, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I see that Ubuntu has done a lot of work to make initscripts send output
> > through lsb printing functions. Are there any plans for Debian to adopt
> > these changes?
>
> The fir
On Mar 21, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see that Ubuntu has done a lot of work to make initscripts send output
> through lsb printing functions. Are there any plans for Debian to adopt
> these changes?
The first step would be for somebody to make a debian lsb-base package,
possibly
> http://people.ubuntu.com/~scott/patches/
Thanks, that is very useful.
I see that Ubuntu has done a lot of work to make initscripts send output
through lsb printing functions. Are there any plans for Debian to adopt
these changes?
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
34 matches
Mail list logo
