lør, 2003-09-27 kl. 07:14 skrev Anthony Towns:
[...]
> Consider ITP's as advisory locks. If you're interested in maintaining
> a package then it's useful information on how to avoid work (email the guy,
> get whatever he's done so far), or a useful advisory of who might be worth
> cooperating with
lør, 2003-09-27 kl. 03:29 skrev Glenn Maynard:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:38:53PM +0200, Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
> > An ITP[1] on thunderbird[2] was originally submitted to the BTA back in
>
> Your footnotes are dangling.
My apologies:
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=19
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:38:53PM +0200, Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> An ITP[1] on thunderbird[2] was originally submitted to the BTA back in
> June. Since then, for various reasons, no package has been uploaded, and
> someone other then the original submitter of the ITP has committed to
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:38:53PM +0200, S?ren Boll Overgaard wrote:
> So, my question is, how long should an ITP be allowed to just sit there
> before someone else (in this case myself or anyone else who would be
> interested) can go ahead and "hijack" it?
As a general rule, until you run out of
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:38:53PM +0200, S?ren Boll Overgaard wrote:
> So, my question is, how long should an ITP be allowed to just sit there
> before someone else (in this case myself or anyone else who would be
> interested) can go ahead and "hijack" it?
Consider ITP's as advisory locks. If y
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:38:53PM +0200, Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
> An ITP[1] on thunderbird[2] was originally submitted to the BTA back in
Your footnotes are dangling.
--
Glenn Maynard
6 matches
Mail list logo
