Hi,
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Christoph Haas wrote:
> Hi, Fabio...
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:16:38PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > Really nice job but the first side effect is already there:
> >
> > Package: icaclient
>
> Thanks for the hint. That was a test package I was uploading to
Hi,
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:16:38PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
>
> > I think upload must be moderated somehow. Even the uploader himself claim
> > that he is unsure about licence of the product.
>
> Well, if the packages can onl
Hi,
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> And that looks like it is f*cked. Is this Depends: done manually?
> I do not thing dpkg-shlibdeps did that. Where is libc6?
Actually i was only worried about the licence because i know it can't be
there. We use it at work :-)
Fabio
--
Our miss
On Mon, 12 May 2003, tony mancill wrote:
> Appropos of this and Colin's statement, my suggestion is to make only a
> deb-src URL available on the site, and to only host source packages. For
That would be one way to solve the problem.
> packages destined for the Debian archive, it's critical tha
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 11:40:04PM -0400, Joe Nahmias wrote:
>
> If I may make a suggestion, a user should only be able to upload a
> package that either:
>
> a) doesn't appear in the repository
>
> - -or-
>
> b) already has the uploader as maintainer
>
> - -or-
>
> c) has a RFA/O bug filed i
Hi,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:16:38PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> I think upload must be moderated somehow. Even the uploader himself claim
> that he is unsure about licence of the product.
Well, if the packages can only be downloaded by registered DDs, then the
problem's solved I'd
Hi,
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> Really nice job but the first side effect is already there:
>
> Package: icaclient
> Version: 6.30-2
> Priority: optional
> Section: net
> Maintainer: Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Depends: libxaw7
And that looks like it is f*cked. Is this Depends: done
Hi, Fabio...
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:16:38PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> Really nice job but the first side effect is already there:
>
> Package: icaclient
Thanks for the hint. That was a test package I was uploading to stress
test the dupload process on the server. It wasn't reall
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, 12 May 2003, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
> We are very proud to announce the opening of the mentors project. We
> have been working very hard[1] on this project since beginning of 2003.
> Now the time has come to test and use it!
Really nice job but the first side effect is alre
I'm glad to see this service.
The Developer's Reference lists
http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/ as being a place to
co-ordinate the sponsoring of packages. Currently it's unavailable to me
(down?). Other problems I have with it include: no place to upload
packages and it's for "
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 05:41:12PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> That's not mutually exclusive. Also, you ask who would ever wish to
> delegate the maintainership of a package. I think the answer is every DD
> who has filed a RFA on a package.
RFA is a Request For Adoption, not a delegation. Th
Hi,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 09:48:49AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 12:07:12PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> [...]
> > Regardless, I actually think it's a wonderful scaleability measure
> > to provide some infrastructure that allows DDs to delegate som
Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However the service
> was created especially for people who e.g. have written an application
> themselves and do not care about becoming a DD.
I object to the conept of "people who do not care abou
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 12:07:12PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
[...]
> Regardless, I actually think it's a wonderful scaleability measure to
> provide some infrastructure that allows DDs to delegate some of the
> packaging work to NMs in the queue, who can prove that they are worth
> their salt,
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 10:48:03PM +0200, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
[...]
> The mentors core-team is:
[...]
> the debian mentors core-team
"core team"? So, when can we expect expulsions? >:)
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Please Cc: unless you mail -devel.
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:02:11AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> You are right. I do plan to apply in a few weeks. However the service
> was created especially for people who e.g. have written an application
> themselves and do not care about becoming a DD.
Is that such a good thing? It might ge
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:51:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 10:48:03PM +0200, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
> > ---
> > Debian Mentors Project
>
> > The mentors core-team is:
> > Christoph Haas (Chri
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 09:33:50PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> Appropos of this and Colin's statement, my suggestion is to make only a
> deb-src URL available on the site, and to only host source packages. For
> packages destined for the Debian archive, it's critical that they be
> reviewed as so
Hi,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:34:08AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:02:11AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > Please bear with me but from what I was told by a number of package
> > maintainers it is a really long way until one has become a DD. Just
> >
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:02:11AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> Please bear with me but from what I was told by a number of package
> maintainers it is a really long way until one has become a DD. Just
> because Daniel was assigned an AM does not mean there is a guarantee he
> will get his DD acc
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:51:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Daniel K. Gebhart (con-fuse) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Christoph Siess (CHS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Why are we giving debian.net addresses to people who don't want to go
> through the "pain" of authenticating themselve
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:30:03AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:29:00AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 05:41:40PM -0600, Jack Moffitt wrote:
> > > Perhaps an easy thing to do would just be to show whether or not a
> > > pckage is signed by a key whic
Hi, Anthony...
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:51:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Uh, as far as I can tell, of the above only Daniel is even in the
> n-m queue; Christoph, Ivo and Christoph appear to not be developers,
> applicants, or even sponsored maintainers of any packages in the archive.
You
Hi,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:51:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 10:48:03PM +0200, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
> > ---
> > Debian Mentors Project
>
> > The mentors core-team is:
> > Christoph Haas
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:29:00AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 05:41:40PM -0600, Jack Moffitt wrote:
> > Perhaps an easy thing to do would just be to show whether or not a
> > pckage is signed by a key which is signed by a real debian developer.
> Surely getting that sign
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 10:48:03PM +0200, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
> ---
> Debian Mentors Project
> The mentors core-team is:
> Christoph Haas (ChrisH)<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ivo Marino (eim) <[EMAIL P
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
> Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:36:12AM
> +1000:
> > *very* serious problem for anyone who starts relying on the binary packages
> > uploaded to m.d.n. What sort of protections do you have in place or plan to
> > pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ivo Marino wrote:
Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
- -- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Tue, 13 May 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > It appears as though anyone who has an account can upload any package they
> > like. While this isn't a p
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
> Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:36:12AM
> +1000:
> > *very* serious problem for anyone who starts relying on the binary packages
> > uploaded to m.d.n. What sort of protections do you have in place or plan to
> > pu
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 05:41:40PM -0600, Jack Moffitt wrote:
> Ivo Marino wrote:
> > Of course we can't actually ensure that all uploaded packages on the
> > system are secure, for now we trust the testers of the system but in
> > future we'll introduce higher security standards.
> >
> > If someo
30 matches
Mail list logo
