On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:08, Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > i'm forwarding this to debian devel for people's attention because
> > it would appear that debian has lost a quite large opportunity -
> > by not having selinux available.
>
> I thought R
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:35:05AM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> i'm forwarding this to debian devel for people's attention because
> it would appear that debian has lost a quite large opportunity -
> by not having selinux available.
>
> l.
>
> - Forwarded message from "SourceF
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
i'm forwarding this to debian devel for people's attention because
it would appear that debian has lost a quite large opportunity -
by not having selinux available.
PR choices, not much else. It is also entirely possible the last of the
Debian faithful have left
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> i'm forwarding this to debian devel for people's attention because
> it would appear that debian has lost a quite large opportunity -
> by not having selinux available.
I thought Russell Coker put a lot of effort in having SELinux ready
with Debian as well. M
* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton:
> i'm forwarding this to debian devel for people's attention because
> it would appear that debian has lost a quite large opportunity - [...]
I'm surprised SourceForge didn't switch to AIX. Really.
(They didn't upgrade to Mailman 2.1, by the way. *sigh*)
* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> i'm forwarding this to debian devel for people's attention because
> it would appear that debian has lost a quite large opportunity -
> by not having selinux available.
Nothing in that message implied the lack of SELinux was why sf went t
6 matches
Mail list logo
