Loudly promoting my own software here...
la, 2005-11-12 kello 10:39 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh kirjoitti:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Besides, depends/pre-depends and conflicts should be more than enough if
> > > done right.
> >
> > Yes, this is what is meant by sup
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Besides, depends/pre-depends and conflicts should be more than enough if
> > done right.
>
> Yes, this is what is meant by supporting partial upgrades. "Supporting
Ah, ok. THAT is what I meant too, in a roundabout way. So we're in
agreement.
> pa
> > New shadow would conflict with ALL packages that do not support the new
> > syntax
>
> Unfortunately, yes; and we saw plenty of occasions in woody->sarge where
> conflicts with old packages made the upgrade path more difficult than it
> should have been...
Up to now, we have identified pbui
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:04:47AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Whatever you choose to do, you need to take care of partial upgrade.
> Not across released stable versions! Since when do we support
> stable/stable+1 mixed systems?
Since
> e.g. you cannot fix Sarge pbuilder anyway, so etch su must work with sarge
> pbuilder. That why it would have been better to announce the change before
> Sarge release.
Maybe, but unfortunately, this bug was properly analysed a few weeks
*after* sarge release. Remember, there were over 150 ope
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Whatever you choose to do, you need to take care of partial upgrade.
Not across released stable versions! Since when do we support
stable/stable+1 mixed systems?
Besides, depends/pre-depends and conflicts should be more than enough if
done right. New
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Nicolas Fran?ois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In #276419, the bug submitter complained that when a command and some
> arguments were passed to su, all these arguments were concatenated, and
> provided to the shell -c option.
>
> This behavior differs from su on other
7 matches
Mail list logo