On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 04:06:35PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> I am of the opinion that the testing distribution has been a great
> help in releasing.
>...
Is this just a personal opinion or backed by any objective evaluation?
I'm asking because as I've already expressed my impression
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 02:02, John Goerzen wrote:
> Simply making a snapshot -- or posting a set of .debs -- does not make
> Debian stable. See #2, for instance.
See below, please.
> > > 2) Provides no way for such a stable release to be integrated into the
> > >security build system;
> >
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 12:59, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> My main gripe with the proposal, as it currently stands, is that it
> provides a solution for problems that haven't been discussed in detail,
> without much space for improvements.
I agree. I think there is a spectrum of measures that could
Op ma, 14-03-2005 te 20:54 -0500, schreef Daniel Jacobowitz:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:51:05PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > Perhaps, but then why not just use the existing testing setup?
>
> Because, as has been explained several times, it doesn't scale.
What are the exact problems?
My main
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:51:05PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:14:47PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:02:05PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > Really, I don't really understand all the difficulty of running
> > > apt-get -b source, or pbui
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:14:47PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:02:05PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > Really, I don't really understand all the difficulty of running
> > apt-get -b source, or pbuilder, or some such for n+1 archs as opposed
> > to just n. With a lit
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:02:05PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> Really, I don't really understand all the difficulty of running
> apt-get -b source, or pbuilder, or some such for n+1 archs as opposed
> to just n. With a little use of ssh keys, the whole thing should be
> completely automated. And
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 10:02:37AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> >And the result of this discussion is what leaves me with great concern.
> >Specifically, the proposal:
> > 1) Provides no way for an arch to produce a stable release after the
> >initial set of archs have produced theirs;
>
> Ha
Anthony Towns writes:
> Halting unstable autobuilding, fixing remaining bugs in an
> arch-specific freeze, then making a snapshot allows you to produce a
> release. It may or may not correspond with Debian stable.
I am of the opinion that the testing distribution has been a great
help in releasi
9 matches
Mail list logo
