On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 02:16:56PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 12:56:08PM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
> wrote:
> > Just for curiosity: shouldn't the old python-pygresql be automatically
> > removed from the archive once it is no more builded?
>
> It doesn't seem
Quoting John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 12:56:08PM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
> wrote:
> > Just for curiosity: shouldn't the old python-pygresql be automatically
> > removed from the archive once it is no more builded?
>
> It doesn't seem to work that way.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 12:56:08PM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> Just for curiosity: shouldn't the old python-pygresql be automatically
> removed from the archive once it is no more builded?
It doesn't seem to work that way.
-- John
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:05:05PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Go for it.
>
> The existing python-pygresql packages will cease to be built when the
> first postgresql 7.4 packages go into unstable. I will then ask the ftp
> maintainers to remove them, so as to clear the way for your packages.
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 15:53, Jim Penny wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:46:15 +0100
> Oliver Elphick wrote:
>
> Barring objection, and there may be some legitimate objection, as I am
> well behind and feeling mighty damned guilty about it, I will pick it
> up. This is somewhat natural because I a
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:46:15 +0100
Oliver Elphick wrote:
Barring objection, and there may be some legitimate objection, as I am
well behind and feeling mighty damned guilty about it, I will pick it
up. This is somewhat natural because I am already PoPy packager, and
PoPy is being merged into pyg
6 matches
Mail list logo
