Hi Mattia,
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:12:51AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > Should I file a separate bug report or will you deal with this?
>
> Filed the one for libmuparser-doc myself.
Thanks.
> BTW, the changelog of the first version without that -doc package did
> not mention dropping th
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:04:16AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > You have a cruft libmuparser-doc (that interestingly is not listed in
> > the cruft-report…).
>
> Should I file a separate bug report or will you deal with this?
Filed the one for libmuparser-doc myself.
BTW, the changelog of the
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 09:25:01AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> It does?
> mattia@warren ~ % rmadison -S -s unstable muparser
> libmuparser-dev | 2.2.6.1+dfsg-1 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf,
> hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel,
> ppc64el, s390x
On 2019-01-22 08:25, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
mattia@warren ~ % rmadison -S -s unstable muparser
libmuparser-dev | 2.2.6.1+dfsg-1 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel,
armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el,
mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libmuparser-doc | 2.2.3-6| unsta
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 08:39:20AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 08/01/19 at 13:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was seeking for remaining references to anonscm in packages in UDD.
> > I've found the following strange hit:
> >
> > udd=> select source, version, maintainer, vcs
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 08:48:15AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> This has settled for R packages now but I found another really strange one:
>
> $ rmadison muparser | grep "unstable "
> muparser | 2.2.3-6| unstable | source
> muparser | 2.2.6.1+dfsg-1 | unstable | s
On 08/01/19 at 13:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was seeking for remaining references to anonscm in packages in UDD.
> I've found the following strange hit:
>
> udd=> select source, version, maintainer, vcs_browser, release from sources
> where source = 'r-bioc-deseq2' and release =
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:51:46PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Mattia,
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:38:18AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > using rmadison is a very quick way to notice this, as you will see the
> > > discrepancy in the architecture list.
> >
> > I see that you started f
Hi Mattia,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:38:18AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > using rmadison is a very quick way to notice this, as you will see the
> > discrepancy in the architecture list.
>
> I see that you started filing a lot of RM requests to remove many of
> such outdated binaries.
Yes.
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 01:30:08PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> cruft versions, usually hold up due to outdated binaries.
>
> In this case of r-bioc-deseq2, the reason is outdated binaries in
> kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386.
>
>
> using rmadison is a very quick way to notice th
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 01:25:48PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I was seeking for remaining references to anonscm in packages in UDD.
> I've found the following strange hit:
>
> udd=> select source, version, maintainer, vcs_browser, release from sources
> where source = 'r-bioc-deseq2' and rele
11 matches
Mail list logo
