Hi Guus
>I don't see that anything has changed in the past ten years, so I don't
>think a clarification will do any good. Why does VirtualBox keep relying
>on the OpenWatcom provider? There's bcc and faucc. QEMU's SeaBIOS is
>compiled with GCC (but looking at the source, all the 16-bit code is in
(I'll drop -devel starting from next email, following up on debian-legal
isntead)
>If you agree, I think it's better to ask the question instead at
>‘debian-legal’.
Hi Debian-Legal list :)
forwarding the discussion from -devel here
Basically, we thought OpenWatcom license wasn't DFSG for Debain
Hi Paul
>I didn't see a question in your mail :)
would a clear statement from them satisfy Debian standards? or should them
relicense?
>Is there any reason they can't relicense to something more standard?
Not sure, big company, legal issues, difficult to track people for changing it,
I don't
3 matches
Mail list logo
