Le February 12, 2008 03:19:47 am Joerg Jaspert, vous avez écrit :
> On 11293 March 1977, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
>
> Lets jump in here, even if not all points address your mail only.
>
> > If by "disfavour" you imply that it's intentional that NEW packages
> > aren't built before being accepted,
Dear Philippe,
if the ressources are scarce, I think that it would be fair that the
internal competition for the access to them would be organised in a
productive way. The current system disfavours the works that changes the
structure of the package. How does this fit in a strategy to optimise
t
Le Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 02:44:59PM -0500, Philippe Cloutier a écrit :
>
> If the NEW package gets earlier in the queue, it's built more quickly,
> but packages that come later are built more slowly.
Dear Philippe,
if the ressources are scarce, I think that it would be fair that the
internal comp
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 20:10:20 -0500 Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> > That probably won't make much time difference on "fast" archs (i386,
> > amd64 etc), but on slower ones like mips, mipsel etc (those sometimes
> > hold up testing transition :().
> A missing build will only slow testing migration if
4 matches
Mail list logo
