> while the coverage is still tiny, there is an effort to collect contact
> addresses listed in the debian/upstream file in the VCS where our source
> packages are maintained.
>
> http://upstream-metadata.debian.net/table/contact
>
> In some cases, it is a valid email address. Perhaps you can
Le Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:38:21AM +0200, Mathieu Parent a écrit :
>
> Dep12 [1] doesn't have a Security-Contact field. Should we add one?
> (and maybe a Security-Submit?)
Hi Mathieu,
the contents of the debian/upstream files is open-ended. You can start anytime
to document and promote the use
Quoting Charles Plessy (2013-06-28 00:07:55)
> Le Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:28:15AM -0400, Alexandre Rebert a écrit :
> >
> > > I wished the respective report would have been sent to the
> > > upstream developers, not to Debian. We could have been a second
> > > resort when upstream does not react
2013/6/28 Charles Plessy :
> Le Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:28:15AM -0400, Alexandre Rebert a écrit :
>>
>> > I wished the respective report would have been sent to the upstream
>> > developers,
>> > not to Debian. We could have been a second resort when upstream does not
>> > react to the reports (no
Le Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:28:15AM -0400, Alexandre Rebert a écrit :
>
> > I wished the respective report would have been sent to the upstream
> > developers,
> > not to Debian. We could have been a second resort when upstream does not
> > react to the reports (not unlikely, admittedly). Now, the
Hi
> I wished the respective report would have been sent to the upstream
> developers,
> not to Debian. We could have been a second resort when upstream does not
> react to the reports (not unlikely, admittedly). Now, the Debian maintainer
> sees the findings two weeks before the bug is made publ
6 matches
Mail list logo
