Re: Re: GDM, getty and VTs

2009-11-17 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Good question. I guess they could be handled like the first text VTs: ready to be started by pressing enter, on a configurable list of /dev/ttyS? devices. How about the following idea: Introduce a configuration directory (e.g. /etc/inittab.d) in which packages can drop files to claim for alloc

Re: Re: GDM, getty and VTs

2009-11-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 16 novembre 2009 à 14:29 +0100, Fabian Greffrath a écrit : > > * Current situation is far from perfect. > > * New GDM upstream, as is, is completely broken. > > Would it be possible to just stick with GDM 2.20 and maintain it as a > fork (just as you do until now)? It’s ver

Re: Re: GDM, getty and VTs

2009-11-16 Thread Fabian Greffrath
* Current situation is far from perfect. * New GDM upstream, as is, is completely broken. Would it be possible to just stick with GDM 2.20 and maintain it as a fork (just as you do until now)? -- Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath Ruhr-Universität Bochum Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen un