Re: Re: DEP-4: The TDeb specification.

Neil Williams wrote: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:45:46 -0400 Filipus Klutiero wrote: [...] > > > That would be a nice improvement, but let me suggest another > > > implementation. To avoid introducing a second diff, why not updating the > > > regular

Re: Re: DEP-4: The TDeb specification.

On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 04:21:59 -0400 Filipus Klutiero wrote: > That would be a nice improvement, but let me suggest another > implementation. To avoid introducing a second diff, why not updating the > regular diff (in the case of non-native packages) but indicating that > the package shouldn't

Re: Re: DEP-4: The TDeb specification.

Neil Williams wrote: On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:06:35 -0400 Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Neil Williams wrote: > > Primary Motivations (in order): > >1. Updates to translations should not require source NMU's. > > > I guess