Dirk Eddelbuettel writes [SuperCite undone]:
> Ian Jackson writes, answering a question of mine:
> > No. I suppose I'm suggesting that the browser packages use a shared
> > file like /etc/default-www-home or something, in much the same way as
> > other packages use /etc/mailname, /etc/news/server
Ian Jackson writes, answering a question of mine:
Ian> No. I suppose I'm suggesting that the browser packages use a shared
Ian> file like /etc/default-www-home or something, in much the same way as
Ian> other packages use /etc/mailname, /etc/news/server and /etc/papersize.
Exactly. Seve
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes [SuperCite undone]:
> [Ian Jackson wrote:]
> > A better solution would be to make it possible to reconfigure all
> > browsers' home pages at once.
>
> Are you proposing that a 'whatever' doc package reconfigures the browsers?
> I'd be afraid of quite some side-effects and
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> daid, regarding doclinux and docdebian:
> Why can't we just stick with `doc' containing both sets of
> documentation ? Is there any point in splitting the package up ?
I like the idea of separate docs collections for vanilla linux
and for incremental debian issue
Ian Jackson writes:
Ian> Why can't we just stick with `doc' containing both sets of
Ian> documentation ? Is there any point in splitting the package up ?
Having two packages permits the user to select the one she wants. There might
be people who can live without the HOWTOs or the Debian d
David H. Silber writes ("Re: RFC: A default html file"):
> > Thanks for the comments on doc, guys. I think I will package the old 'doc'
> > as
> > `doclinux' and create a new `docdebian' with Debian specific documentation,
> > especially a
>
> Thanks for the comments on doc, guys. I think I will package the old 'doc' as
> `doclinux' and create a new `docdebian' with Debian specific documentation,
> especially as Ian M. promised the manual for today :-)
> (As an aside: doclinux and docdebian or rather doc-linux and doc-debian ?)
do
7 matches
Mail list logo
