> Look at the debian dir of the package you are backporting. ;)
> Hint - k3b-0.9/debian/patches/02_k3bcdparanoialib.dpatch
My fault: i did not do a backport. I just build a woody package from
pure upstream sources... But thank you for the hint.
Henning
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:58:34PM +0200, Henning Moll wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 October 2003 13:27, Colin Watson wrote:
> > No, plain .so links are only needed for build-time linking, and
> > therefore live in development packages.
>
> Thank you for that information!
>
> But now i am in a bit of
Hi!
Am 2003-10-08 16:58 +0200 schrieb Henning Moll:
> But now i am in a bit of trouble: i packaged a woody backport of k3b.
> This programm tries to dlopen (=at runtime) 'libcdda_paranoia.so'. But
> that is only possible if package 'libcdparanoia0-dev' is installed.
> This would mean a dependen
Henning Moll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But now i am in a bit of trouble: i packaged a woody backport of k3b.
> This programm tries to dlopen (=at runtime) 'libcdda_paranoia.so'. But
> that is only possible if package 'libcdparanoia0-dev' is installed.
> This would mean a dependency to a dev
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 16:58, Henning Moll wrote:
> Is this a bug in k3b? Should k3b try to dlopen 'libcdda_paranoia.so.0'
> instead? Is there a standard for so-naming (which is respected by all/
> most Gnu/Linux distributions)?
Shared object files that are private to a project are usually n
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:58:34PM +0200, Henning Moll wrote:
> But now i am in a bit of trouble: i packaged a woody backport of k3b.
> This programm tries to dlopen (=at runtime) 'libcdda_paranoia.so'. But
> that is only possible if package 'libcdparanoia0-dev' is installed.
> This would mean a
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 13:27, Colin Watson wrote:
> No, plain .so links are only needed for build-time linking, and
> therefore live in development packages.
Thank you for that information!
But now i am in a bit of trouble: i packaged a woody backport of k3b.
This programm tries to dlopen
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:13:45PM +0200, Henning Moll wrote:
> I wonder why there is a symbolic link
>
> /usr/lib/libcdda_paranoia.so -> libcdda_paranoia.so.0.9.8
>
> in package 'libcdparanoia0-dev'. Shouldn't that be in 'libcdparanoia0'?
No, plain .so links are only needed for build-time link
8 matches
Mail list logo
