Re: Question about GFDL licensed works

2006-02-12 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:05:57AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le dimanche 12 février 2006 à 09:22 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : > > Am I in violation of the License merely by unpacking make or > > by doing an "tla get" on my machine? If I am, why is this free -- I > > can't even

Re: Question about GFDL licensed works

2006-02-12 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 12 février 2006 à 09:22 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : > Am I in violation of the License merely by unpacking make or > by doing an "tla get" on my machine? If I am, why is this free -- I > can't even unpack the sources " with no Invariant Sections, with no > Front-Cover T

Re: Question about GFDL

2005-01-07 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
"Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just run over some problem I'd like to get discussed here, as it > might effect wheather some GFDL documents are distributeable at > all and thus wheather they could be included in the non-free > section or the sarge distribution. Please ask yo

Re: Question about GFDL

2005-01-07 Thread Florian Weimer
* Bernhard R. Link: > Consider next that this info file does not contain the advertised > section nor contains the GFDL at all. I think that's why there is a @copying directive in recent Texinfo versions. You could change the Texinfo source to use it.