On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:57:06AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 04:48:59PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > On 2003-10-06 15:46:01 +0100 Eric Sharkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >However, if you look at the logo as a component of Debian as a whole,
> > >and consider derived work
On 2003-10-06 19:57:06 +0100 Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A logo is a graphical equivalent of a name.
I do not believe that, either. The logo is more of a creative work
than a word.
As to your example, you should note that the BSD licence does not
attempt to enforce the trademark its
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 04:48:59PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2003-10-06 15:46:01 +0100 Eric Sharkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >However, if you look at the logo as a component of Debian as a whole,
> >and consider derived works of the logo to be derived works of Debian,
> Surely the logo is a w
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:07:05PM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
> Debian Open Use Logo License
>
> Copyright (c) 1999 Software in the Public Interest
> -This logo or a modified version may be used by anyone to refer to the
> -Debian project, but does not indicate endorsement by the project.
> +This l
4 matches
Mail list logo
