Re: PostgreSQL in testing

2001-05-08 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 11:14:40AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: > aj: feel free to remove php3 from testing if it will make things easier. I'd > like to get php4 there ass php3 is not maintained upstream anymore. I think it would be good to keep php3 around for people who feel that php4's license is br

Re: PostgreSQL in testing

2001-05-08 Thread Petr Cech
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 06:09:10PM +0100 , Oliver Elphick wrote: > Anthony Towns wrote: > >Nah, it's the other way around: one of the php3 binaries in testing > >doesn't work with the postgresql in unstable, and the php3 in unstable > >doesn't work with the postgresql in testing; ditto some o

Re: PostgreSQL in testing

2001-05-07 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 06:09:10PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote: > Anthony Towns wrote: > >Nah, it's the other way around: one of the php3 binaries in testing > >doesn't work with the postgresql in unstable, and the php3 in unstable > >doesn't work with the postgresql in testing; ditto some ot

Re: PostgreSQL in testing

2001-05-07 Thread Oliver Elphick
Anthony Towns wrote: >Nah, it's the other way around: one of the php3 binaries in testing >doesn't work with the postgresql in unstable, and the php3 in unstable >doesn't work with the postgresql in testing; ditto some other php3 binary >and apache, and a few other similar things. It gets q

Re: PostgreSQL in testing

2001-05-07 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:50:28PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > > The real problem will've been that postgresql probably needs to be > > updated at the same time as php3 and apache and python and a handful of > IMO it shouldn't depend on any of these and it probably does not. :-) Nah, it's the o

Re: PostgreSQL in testing

2001-05-07 Thread Michael Meskes
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 10:22:19PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > A serious bug is enough to keep a package out of testing; it's even enough > to get it pulled from testing if it's already there, especially one that's > almost a year old... Sure. I meant to say that I was surprised that this bug is

Re: PostgreSQL in testing

2001-05-07 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:22:46AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > But more important I wonder why postgresl 6.5.3 is still in testing and not > 7.0.*. After all 7.1 has been released some weeks ago. > Looking into the bug tracking system I found that there is one bug against > postgresql tagged se