Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Following some discussion with Marco d'Itri about inetd, I'd like to
> put forward some more general thoughts on virtual package handling for
> some comments.
>
> Currently, virtual packages (such as mail-transport-agent) cannot be
> specified by themselve
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 00:29, Steve Langasek took the opportunity to say:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 01:51:39PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > On Monday 28 August 2006 21:06, Steve Langasek took the opportunity to
say:
> > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:01:57PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
>
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 01:51:39PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On Monday 28 August 2006 21:06, Steve Langasek took the opportunity to say:
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:01:57PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > > Making mail-transport-agent the empty package, and having it depend only
> > > on
On Monday 28 August 2006 21:06, Steve Langasek took the opportunity to say:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:01:57PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > Making mail-transport-agent the empty package, and having it depend only
> > on exim4 (the default), should work. Of course, exim4 can't conflict with
>
Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually they can, but it's recommended that a real package be given as
> well. From /usr/share/lintian/checks/fields.desc:
> Tag: virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends
> Type: warning
> Ref: policy 7.4
> Info: The package declares a de
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:01:57PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Making mail-transport-agent the empty package, and having it depend only on
> exim4 (the default), should work. Of course, exim4 can't conflict with it
> (but it's enough that all the others do),
No, that's not enough. The exim
On Monday 28 August 2006 18:48, Aurelien Jarno took the opportunity to say:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Following some discussion with Marco d'Itri about inetd, I'd like to
> > put forward some more general thoughts on virtual package handling for
> > some comments.
> >
> > Currently
Roger Leigh wrote:
Hi folks,
Following some discussion with Marco d'Itri about inetd, I'd like to
put forward some more general thoughts on virtual package handling for
some comments.
Currently, virtual packages (such as mail-transport-agent) cannot be
specified by themselves. They can only be
On Monday 28 August 2006 18:09, Jonas Meurer took the opportunity to say:
> On 28/08/2006 Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > Making mail-transport-agent the empty package, and having it depend only
> > on exim4 (the default), should work. Of course, exim4 can't conflict with
> > it (but it's enough that al
On 28/08/2006 Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Making mail-transport-agent the empty package, and having it depend only on
> exim4 (the default), should work. Of course, exim4 can't conflict with it
> (but it's enough that all the others do), so if the default is changed then
> the old default, the new
On Monday 28 August 2006 14:59, Roger Leigh took the opportunity to say:
> For the case of mail-transport-agent, this could be simply solved by
> the creation of a mail-transport-agent-default package. This would
> be an empty package, doing nothing but providing this dependency:
>
> Depends: ex
11 matches
Mail list logo
