Re: Plib, shared libraries issue.

2008-04-15 Thread Ove Kaaven
Mike Hommey skrev: On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 02:36:17PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote: Bradley Smith skrev: 1. Should these shared libraries be built, or should it just stick to static libraries as upstream intended? There are advantages and disadvantages with either... I don't really have a strong o

Re: Plib, shared libraries issue.

2008-04-15 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 02:36:17PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote: > Bradley Smith skrev: >> 1. Should these shared libraries be built, or should it just stick to >> static libraries as upstream intended? > > There are advantages and disadvantages with either... I don't really > have a strong opinion my

Re: Plib, shared libraries issue.

2008-04-15 Thread Ove Kaaven
Bradley Smith skrev: 1. Should these shared libraries be built, or should it just stick to static libraries as upstream intended? There are advantages and disadvantages with either... I don't really have a strong opinion myself (as long as the result works). But if I had to choose, I'd probab