> this since he asked for it a while back. The upgrade to libc6 for perl
> can't happen until there is a libgdbm compatible with it though since I
> refuse to break everyone's dbm interfaces. I'll also be able to release
Great - as soon as I get some consensus on package naming, I'll try to
put
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Scott Ellis, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>As the official version of perl 5.004 is finally out (I must admit I
>haven't installed the debian package yet, but I run webservers with lots
>of perl CGI and can't afford to break them), I have a few q
"Scott K. Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My main concern is that they neither bunch up on the dpkg select screen,
> nor is it easy to search for perl modules in dselect (I'd like to be able
> to find all the perl modules by searching on perl).
BTW, I maintain alias and www-search (and libwww
On 19 May 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Well, with 5.004, CGI-modules is obsolete, and so the
> misnaming of the CGI modules package is a solved issue
> ;-). (Unless. of course, there is a hew-and-cry about removing the
> package, I'd suggest removing CGI-modules from hamm).
No real ob
Hi,
Well, with 5.004, CGI-modules is obsolete, and so the
misnaming of the CGI modules package is a solved issue
;-). (Unless. of course, there is a hew-and-cry about removing the
package, I'd suggest removing CGI-modules from hamm).
As for the description issue, even the one l
5 matches
Mail list logo
