On 2006-08-21 13:53:01, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
The deb-src are available here:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tptest3
You can find a more resent and polished version here:
http://ftp.datanom.net/tptest3/
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG keys:
michae
On 2006-08-21 12:50:01, Guillem Jover wrote:
I'm not talking about upstream but Debian ports (see below). Also you
said you are taking over upstream, and reducing its portability seems
as well a step back...
It is not that I am removing something - except for stuff doing GUI for
MS Windows a
As complement to what Wouter and Michael have replied...
On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 23:24:49 +0200, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> What I have made is a generic package which just does not concerns
> itself with other arches than for GNU/Linux. If people wants to compile
> for *BSD or Solaris they can get
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 11:24:49PM +0200, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
>
> On 2006-08-20 20:00:57, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >
> >If the current build system supports those arches, and yours does
> >not,
> You can hardly call it the "Current build system" as it is a number of
> Makefiles in which you n
On 2006-08-21 00:40:09, Michael Banck wrote:
libc6 is only available on GNU/Linux, you probably mean glibc. If
that
is the case, then it should probably be fine
Correct:-)
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael rasmussen cc
http://keyserver.veridis.com:1137
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 11:24:49PM +0200, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> Which non-linux versions are you referring to? If the compile with
> option -std=c99 and -pedantic showing no warnings or errors the ought
> to be able to compile on any arch with gcc-4.1. Only dependency for
> building it i
On 2006-08-20 20:00:57, Guillem Jover wrote:
If the current build system supports those arches, and yours does
not,
You can hardly call it the "Current build system" as it is a number of
Makefiles in which you need, manually, to add some defines.
What I have made is a generic package which
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 23:10:04 +0200, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> On 2006-08-14 22:33:49, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > Do you plan to support other system than linux in a fork? If no, there
> > is
> Well, the software is already prepared to support *BSD, Solaris and
> Linux, but I only intent to supp
Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have some questions I hope some of you have an answer for.
>
> I intend to package a peace of software which does not use autotools
> but only has a plain Makefile.
>
> 1) Can I use dh_make?
> 2) Does Debian policy have something to say about it?
No.
>
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 09:50:51PM +0200, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have some questions I hope some of you have an answer for.
>
> I intend to package a peace of software which does not use autotools
> but only has a plain Makefile.
>
> 1) Can I use dh_make?
Sure.
> 2) Does D
On 2006-08-14 22:55:41, Sam Morris wrote:
Sure, just customise the rules file it generates to not call a
configure
script. The rules file can really contain anything you want, as long
as it
builds a decent package when called. :)
Nice, I have been accustomed to use dh_make and the various conf
On 2006-08-14 22:33:49, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Do you plan to support other system than linux in a fork? If no, there
is
Well, the software is already prepared to support *BSD, Solaris and
Linux, but I only intent to support Linux - the only thing I use on a
day to day basis.
absolutely
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:50:51 +0200, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> I intend to package a peace of software which does not use autotools
> but only has a plain Makefile.
>
> 1) Can I use dh_make?
Sure, just customise the rules file it generates to not call a configure
script. The rules file can real
Am Montag 14 August 2006 21:50 schrieb Michael Rasmussen:
> I intend to package a peace of software which does not use autotools
[...]
> 3) Would it be ok if I converted it to use autotools my self?
Do you plan to support other system than linux in a fork? If no, there is
absolutely no gain in us
Michael Rasmussen wrote:
Hi list,
I have some questions I hope some of you have an answer for.
I intend to package a peace of software which does not use autotools
but only has a plain Makefile.
1) Can I use dh_make?
I don't think so, I hardly use debhelper but I think dh_make is used
when
Hi again,
Sorry, I forgot the must obvious question.
5) Would there be any interest in the community for be doing it?
This question should have been numbered 1 since it is clearly a
show-stopper:-)
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael rasmussen cc
http://
16 matches
Mail list logo
