Hi Rodrigo,
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:21:12AM -0800, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
> I do!
ah, nice to hear from you.
> I have been extremely remiss in my duties, and I have let ego keep
> me from accepting it.
>
> I have orphaned stunnel and all of my other packages. Feel free to
> NMU/take over as
On Friday, February 07, 2014 17:09:27 Ian Jackson wrote:
> Chris Knadle writes ("Re: Packaging of stunnel / MIA for Luis Rodrigo
> Gallardo Cruz"): ...
>
> > Well, here's the typical scenario:
> >- maintainer stops maintaining a package, for whatever rea
Chris Knadle writes ("Re: Packaging of stunnel / MIA for Luis Rodrigo Gallardo
Cruz"):
...
> Well, here's the typical scenario:
>
>- maintainer stops maintaining a package, for whatever reason,
> and doesn't respond to communication... for a long ti
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 06:56:04PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
> I know; I agree with you and I think the text is a bit misleading -- by
> stating that you shouldn't change the packaging style it seems to indicate
> that NMUs are supposed to be minimalistic, but a situation in which the
> maintai
Leaving off the MIA team on this reply, mainly because I don't think this is
"news" to them per se and I'd rather not "spam" them.
On Friday, February 07, 2014 02:54:09 Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 06:56:04PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > I know; I agree with you and I thin
Adding Gregor Herrmann to this because he and I were looking to work on
#672198 but we both were swamped with other work.
On Friday, February 07, 2014 00:02:16 Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 03:27:51PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 06, 2014 13:59:59 Seba
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 03:27:51PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
> On Thursday, February 06, 2014 13:59:59 Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> [...]
>
> NMUs don't necessarily need to be minimalistic -- for instance packaging new
> versions is something that can be done with NMUs. This is admittedly not
> t
On Thursday, February 06, 2014 13:59:59 Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There have been multiple new upstream releases for stunnel4 and the
> package has gathered quite some bugs without any feedback from its
> maintainer. Looking at Rodrigo's QA page [0] his last actions were
> quite some time
8 matches
Mail list logo
