On Feb 03, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This clause has been examined carefully in the past and deemed ugly
> but not non-free (at least, with no serious objections)--at least in
> the "Apache", etc. cases. However, I don't think that should be extended
> to the general case; "nor m
(Why is this being CC'd to d-d?)
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:06:32PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
>4. Products derived from this software may not be called "PHP", nor
>may "PHP" appear in their name, without prior written permission
>from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...]
>
> For example, I shoul
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006, Charles Fry wrote:
> Instead I propose that all RC bugs in PHP Group software released
> with the PHP License be closed.
>
> For the record, all previous discussions of this matter on
> debian-legal have suggested that the PHP License might be non-free
> for everything (includ
-Original Message-
> From: José Carlos do Nascimento Medeiros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages
> Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:27:53 -0200
> To: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-legal@lists.debia
Charles,
I agree with you, but I think ftp master will not change.
I really do not have more time to this unfinished topic :(
Can you adopt these packages that have RC bugs because license ?
php-net-checkip
php-services-weather
I will be very grateful, as this packages are dependence from anothe
It would be most helpful if we could make some progress on this issue.
There are a handful of RC bugs whose maintainers are trying to work with
their upstream authors to find resolution. In some cases the upstream
authors believe that the problem should be fixed with the new PHP
License. It is beco
6 matches
Mail list logo
