On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 09:01:40AM -0500, Daniel Martin wrote:
>
> > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Well, if someone would like to configure the MTA that runs
> > > bugs.debian.org to
> > > send CC's of all bug mail to another a
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 09:01:40AM -0500, Daniel Martin wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, if someone would like to configure the MTA that runs bugs.debian.org
> > to
> > send CC's of all bug mail to another address, ...
>
> You mean something other than signing up
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 04:06:35PM -0800, Ralph Jennings wrote:
The problem is not that easy to solve I think. Basicly the problem is
that you upgrade a tool that the install program depends on. If you install
the perl-5.6 package before anything alse things will probably work just
fine.
The prob
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, if someone would like to configure the MTA that runs bugs.debian.org to
> send CC's of all bug mail to another address, ...
You mean something other than signing up for debian-bugs-dist and
parsing the resulting traffic?
I realize that debian-bu
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:52:41AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> > BTW. Why didn't you post a bug report about this?
>
> I did, I only bcc'd it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], so that replies wouldn't spam
> the bts.
I filed the critical Bug Report #80197 20 days ago... even the old perl
packages
where bro
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 04:54:11PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
[snip]
> > ANY package that is needed by the packaging system(and this does not only
> > include dpkg support scripts, but debconf, and some maintainer scripts,
> > including adduser) NEEDS TO NOT BREAK PERIOD.
[snip]
> BTW: upgrading p
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 11:54:23AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > It's long past time that the BTS had a real database backend. Since the
> > code is being actively worked on, I assume there are reasons why this isn't
> > feasible yet. Do you know wha
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> It's long past time that the BTS had a real database backend. Since the code
> is being actively worked on, I assume there are reasons why this isn't
> feasible
> yet. Do you know what they are? Is there any way I can help?
I have code that imports
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 11:42:06AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > I thought the reason for switching from the generated HTML to CGIs was so
> > that the pages could be dynamically generated, and we wouldn't have this
> > problem.
>
> you're correct, th
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I thought the reason for switching from the generated HTML to CGIs was so that
> the pages could be dynamically generated, and we wouldn't have this problem.
you're correct, that is the reason. But the indices take too long to fully
dynamically generat
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:16:09AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Ron Rademaker wrote:
>
> >
> > I checked BTS and the bug wasn't in BTS.
>
> Because the indices only run every 12 hours. Check 81679.
I thought the reason for switching from the generated HTML to CGIs was so tha
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Ron Rademaker wrote:
>
> I checked BTS and the bug wasn't in BTS.
Because the indices only run every 12 hours. Check 81679.
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 04:50:05PM +0100, Ron Rademaker wrote:
> > Hmm, isn't sid called UNSTABLE, that means that if you want use it, there
> > is a risk that things aren't exactly perfect (don't take perfect to
> > seriously).
>
> That doesn't solve t
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 04:50:05PM +0100, Ron Rademaker wrote:
> Hmm, isn't sid called UNSTABLE, that means that if you want use it, there
> is a risk that things aren't exactly perfect (don't take perfect to
> seriously).
That doesn't solve that perl's official maintainer broke the packages quit
Hi Adam!
You wrote:
> ANY package that is needed by the packaging system(and this does not only
> include dpkg support scripts, but debconf, and some maintainer scripts,
> including adduser) NEEDS TO NOT BREAK PERIOD.
Please calm down. If your specific thing doesn't work, OK, that's worth
a bug
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Ron Rademaker wrote:
> Hmm, isn't sid called UNSTABLE, that means that if you want use it, there
> is a risk that things aren't exactly perfect (don't take perfect to
> seriously).
> Not that long ago I upgraded one of my machines from woody to sid, now
> it's running perl 5.6
Hmm, isn't sid called UNSTABLE, that means that if you want use it, there
is a risk that things aren't exactly perfect (don't take perfect to
seriously).
Not that long ago I upgraded one of my machines from woody to sid, now
it's running perl 5.6 and I didn't have any trouble upgrading at all!
BT
17 matches
Mail list logo
