Re: Open then gates (was: UPG and the default umask)

2010-05-14 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 02:18 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Guys, IMHO you really need to stop ranting contentlessly. Either you > reply to the technical arguments in favor of the change that have been > made (e.g. by Russ Allbery in this thread, to which you carefully > avoided to reply thus f

Re: Open then gates (was: UPG and the default umask)

2010-05-14 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Sa den 15. Mai 2010 um 1:18 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli: > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 01:57:05AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > > Klaus Ethgen wrote: > > > A black day in the security of Debian. Well.. One more. > > Absolutely true,... :-(

Re: Open then gates (was: UPG and the default umask)

2010-05-14 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 01:57:05AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Klaus Ethgen wrote: > > A black day in the security of Debian. Well.. One more. > Absolutely true,... :-( Guys, IMHO you really need to stop ranting contentlessly. Either you reply to the technical arguments in favor of t

Re: Open then gates (was: UPG and the default umask)

2010-05-14 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Klaus Ethgen wrote: > A black day in the security of Debian. Well.. One more. Absolutely true,... :-( Now that we have Ubuntu as competitor, which is nicely coloured and where everything "just works", let's try to imitate (and integrate Ubuntu stuff) as much as possible. Or even better,... let's