Re: Open beta of debhelper compat level 11 (debhelper/10.10.7)

2017-11-18 Thread Niels Thykier
Christoph Biedl: > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote... > >> One thing with compat 10 that doesn't make a lot of sense to me is how >> dh_missing is enabled by default but a no-op. It'd make more sense to me to >> change that in compat 11 to be enabled by default and run with --list-missing >> (--fail-

Re: Open beta of debhelper compat level 11 (debhelper/10.10.7)

2017-11-18 Thread Niels Thykier
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: > On 18/11/17 12:41, Niels Thykier wrote: >> I have received several requests to make --list-missing or >> --fail-missing the default (#650129 and #858834) and I intend to do so >> eventually. I am a little concerned with adding more changes to compat >> 11 (the list is rat

Re: Open beta of debhelper compat level 11 (debhelper/10.10.7)

2017-11-18 Thread Niels Thykier
Maximiliano Curia: > ¡Hola Niels! > > El 2017-11-18 a las 11:41 +, Niels Thykier escribió: >> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: >>> It'd make more sense to me to change that in compat 11 to be enabled >>> by default and run with --list-missing (--fail-missing is probably >>> too much at this point), or

Re: Open beta of debhelper compat level 11 (debhelper/10.10.7)

2017-11-18 Thread Maximiliano Curia
¡Hola Niels! El 2017-11-18 a las 11:41 +, Niels Thykier escribió: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: It'd make more sense to me to change that in compat 11 to be enabled by default and run with --list-missing (--fail-missing is probably too much at this point), or make it run with --list or --fail-m

Re: Open beta of debhelper compat level 11 (debhelper/10.10.7)

2017-11-18 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 18/11/17 12:41, Niels Thykier wrote: > I have received several requests to make --list-missing or > --fail-missing the default (#650129 and #858834) and I intend to do so > eventually. I am a little concerned with adding more changes to compat > 11 (the list is rather long already), but I am ha

Re: Open beta of debhelper compat level 11 (debhelper/10.10.7)

2017-11-18 Thread Niels Thykier
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: > On 12/11/17 11:25, Niels Thykier wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> The debhelper compat level 11 is about to be finalized and we invite you >> to test it out. There are no additional changes planned to compat 11 at >> the moment, but there might be changes in response to feedback fr

Re: Open beta of debhelper compat level 11 (debhelper/10.10.7)

2017-11-18 Thread Christoph Biedl
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote... > One thing with compat 10 that doesn't make a lot of sense to me is how > dh_missing is enabled by default but a no-op. It'd make more sense to me to > change that in compat 11 to be enabled by default and run with --list-missing > (--fail-missing is probably too m

Re: Open beta of debhelper compat level 11 (debhelper/10.10.7)

2017-11-18 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 12/11/17 11:25, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > > The debhelper compat level 11 is about to be finalized and we invite you > to test it out. There are no additional changes planned to compat 11 at > the moment, but there might be changes in response to feedback from testers. One thing with co

Re: Open beta of debhelper compat level 11 (debhelper/10.10.7)

2017-11-12 Thread Niels Thykier
Adrian Bunk: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 10:25:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: >> ... >> >> Backport availability >> = >> ... >> *Caveat*: Packages using the cmake build system should be careful as >> cmake in stretch does not respond to the >> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_RUNSTATEDIR=/run ch

Re: Open beta of debhelper compat level 11 (debhelper/10.10.7)

2017-11-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 10:25:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: >... > Full list of changes in compat 11 > = >... > > - The cmake buildsystem now passes > > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_RUNSTATEDIR=/run to cmake(1). > > > > Caveat: Th