Le jeudi 23 février 2006 à 19:56 -0500, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
> One final open-ended question is: which consumes more resources?
> Duplicate packaging or backporting?
No, the question is how is the Ubuntu project willing to spend its
resources.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 07:56:42PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> The solution would be to convince Ubuntu to branch from stable instead
> of sid. The problem is that this creates a lot of work for Ubuntu
> because they have to backport all of the desired bleeding-edge stuff.
> However, Debian d
Michael Gilbert wrote:
> I've read a lot about the binary incompatibility concern between
> Debian and Ubuntu.
It is a design decision of ubuntu to ensure source code compatibility
only. Binary compatibility to debian/stable is not a release goal.
> I think that Ubuntu's motivation to provide the
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> First of all, I think it is useful to analyze Ubuntu's motivation --
> releasing well-integrated bleeding-edge software. The easiest way to
> accomplish this goal is by branching from sid. This means that Ubuntu
> libraries differ from the stable Debi
4 matches
Mail list logo
