On 21-Jan-99 Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
>> I think, and this is just off the cuff, that my problem with the
>> license, be it the former OR latter, is the fact that the USER now
>> has a license issue to deal with. I think (again, on the fly) that
>> there should be no extra licensing worries for th
On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 08:56:09PM -0800, Darren Benham wrote:
> On 20-Jan-99 Anderson MacKay wrote:
> > As I read the license, it just requires that you display notice that your
> > website was created using Zope, e.g. a sort of "powered by Zope" logo
> > kinda thing, and you need a "credits" page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 20-Jan-99 Anderson MacKay wrote:
> As I read the license, it just requires that you display notice that your
> website was created using Zope, e.g. a sort of "powered by Zope" logo
> kinda thing, and you need a "credits" page of some sort. I'm not even
> sur
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, Darren Benham wrote:
> On 20-Jan-99 Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> > In the case of Zope, I have to disagree. You have to think of Zope as
> > an application with an GUI realized in HTML. I don't see a difference
> > to an application that publishes its GUI as X11 calls:
> >
> > You
On 20-Jan-99 Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> In the case of Zope, I have to disagree. You have to think of Zope as
> an application with an GUI realized in HTML. I don't see a difference
> to an application that publishes its GUI as X11 calls:
>
> Your DFSG2 draft says "The license may require such noti
On Sat, Jan 16, 1999 at 06:39:53PM -0800, Darren Benham wrote:
> I'm not sure I'd agree that the version of DFSG aj and I are working
> would allow the "powered by" clause -- atleast not as a binding
> restriction. In our proposal, the section you quote says nothing
> about the notices in finished
6 matches
Mail list logo
