Re: My packages are not in frozen -- why?

On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 02:50:14PM -0400, Shaleh wrote: > Is this not sufficient: > > Distribution: frozen unstable > Changes: > gdk-imlib (1.1-6) frozen unstable; urgency=low > . >* Fixed the symlinks to lib.so.x -- was done in the wrong package > The same is (or was) in my imlib packag

Re: My packages are not in frozen -- why?

Is this not sufficient: Distribution: frozen unstable Changes: gdk-imlib (1.1-6) frozen unstable; urgency=low . * Fixed the symlinks to lib.so.x -- was done in the wrong package The same is (or was) in my imlib package. -- --- How can you see,

Re: My packages are not in frozen -- why?

On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 02:05:49PM -0400, Shaleh wrote: > My imlib and gdk_imlib packages are being put in slink instead of > frozen. The ones in frozen presently are out of date and frankly -- I > screwed them up. Please put my new packages in frozen. In the > changelog I have "frozen unstable"

Re: My Packages to go

> p2c > rxvt > ircii > ytalk > tcsh > tf > mandelspawn > lynx > xtron Hi. I think that I'd be interested in p2c if it's what I think it is (a Pascal to C converter). -- Ed Petron [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.leba.net/~epetron

Re: My Packages

> xinvaders > mandelspawn > lynx > xtet42 > xtron I'l be glad to take mirrormagic, xinvaders, and xtet42. -- #!/bin/perl -sp0777i

Re: My Packages

Sven Rudolph writes: > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Howell) writes: > > > Hi, I'm very sorry to say that I don't have the time that I need > > to continue looking after my packages anymore. So anyone that > > wants to take on the following packages is welcome to m

Re: My packages

Michael Meskes wrote: : : Here are the one I found new maintainers for. Is there a list where we have : to enter the packages? Also some of these are listed as 'maintainer wants to : give away'. I take it this should be changed. : : : The packages I still have are: : : adjtimex 1.2-4 : fdu