On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 13:06 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 14, Fathi Boudra wrote:
>
> > it was my use case, unfortunately udev package upgrade failed and
> > apt-get dist-upgrade stopped.
>
> This is the cause, the new linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-* packages do not
> match the regexp.
> Kernel
On Jan 14, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> it was my use case, unfortunately udev package upgrade failed and
> apt-get dist-upgrade stopped.
This is the cause, the new linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-* packages do not
match the regexp.
Kernel people, should I change it?
ver=$(echo $pkg | sed -nr
"s/^.*linux-im
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Yes, this will require a lockstep upgrade like it happened for lenny.
> If you upgrade both the kernel and udev at the same time the udev
> package will detect it and bypass the version check.
it was my use case, unfortunately udev package u
On Jan 14, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> I would like to come back to the distribution upgrade issue since udev
> package cannot be installed if the kernel doesn't support
> CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED (like Lenny kernel 2.6.26).
Yes, this will require a lockstep upgrade like it happened for lenny.
If you up
Hi,
I would like to come back to the distribution upgrade issue since udev
package cannot be installed if the kernel doesn't support
CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED (like Lenny kernel 2.6.26).
Recently, I have updated a machine from Lenny to Squeeze and apt-get
dist-upgrade failed as expected.
The kernel
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 10, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
>> Due to changes in udev 147, squeeze will not support kernels earlier
>> than 2.6.27.
> I uploaded a 147-2 package which reverts the O_CLOEXEC change and allows
> 2.6.26, let's see if it works.
Big thanks for working on this issue. I hope i
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow (11/11/2009):
>> Homework: Find out how
>>
>> I uploaded a 147-2 package which reverts the O_CLOEXEC change and
>> allows 2.6.26, let's see if it works.
>>
>> translates to
>>
>> I stop using inotify_init1().
>
> Easy:
> | --- a/udev/ude
Goswin von Brederlow (11/11/2009):
> Homework: Find out how
>
> I uploaded a 147-2 package which reverts the O_CLOEXEC change and
> allows 2.6.26, let's see if it works.
>
> translates to
>
> I stop using inotify_init1().
Easy:
| --- a/udev/udev-watch.c
| +++ b/udev/udev-watch.c
| @@
Julien Cristau writes:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 16:45:58 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> According to "man 2 open":
>>
>>O_CLOEXEC (Since Linux 2.6.23)
>>
>> So why does using this flag require 2.6.27? Who is wrong here?
>>
> If you'd actually bothered to look at the changes i
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 04:51:49PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 11, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> >O_CLOEXEC (Since Linux 2.6.23)
> > So why does using this flag require 2.6.27? Who is wrong here?
> I understand that it is needed for inotify_init1(2).
That makes more send. The s
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 16:45:58 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> According to "man 2 open":
>
>O_CLOEXEC (Since Linux 2.6.23)
>
> So why does using this flag require 2.6.27? Who is wrong here?
>
If you'd actually bothered to look at the changes in question, you would
have noticed t
On Nov 11, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>O_CLOEXEC (Since Linux 2.6.23)
>
> So why does using this flag require 2.6.27? Who is wrong here?
I understand that it is needed for inotify_init1(2).
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Nov 10, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
>> Due to changes in udev 147, squeeze will not support kernels earlier
>> than 2.6.27.
> I uploaded a 147-2 package which reverts the O_CLOEXEC change and allows
> 2.6.26, let's see if it works.
>
> --
> ciao,
> Marco
Acco
On Nov 10, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Due to changes in udev 147, squeeze will not support kernels earlier
> than 2.6.27.
I uploaded a 147-2 package which reverts the O_CLOEXEC change and allows
2.6.26, let's see if it works.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Zitat von Julien Cristau :
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 02:14:00 -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 07:56:16AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Due to changes in udev 147, squeeze will not support kernels earlier
> > than
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 02:14:00 -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 07:56:16AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > Due to changes in udev 147, squeeze will not support kernels earlier
> > > than 2.6.27.
> >
> > What a
retitle 549710 release-notes: [SQUEEZE] udev drops support for kernels < 2.6.22
(or <2.6.27)
thanks
The requirement might be raised to 2.6.27
(which is higher that the one in Lenny).
See udev maintainer announcement and thread[1]:
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 18:08 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote in:
> Due
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 07:56:16AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Due to changes in udev 147, squeeze will not support kernels earlier
> > than 2.6.27.
>
> What are these changes?
Seems it is related to signalfd4 syscall.
- Adam
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Due to changes in udev 147, squeeze will not support kernels earlier
> than 2.6.27.
What are these changes?
> If your packages have code needed to support old kernels, this is the
> right time to clean it up.
No.
> This means that
On Nov 10, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Yes, it would not work because they also tend to be incompatible with
> > older configurations and so packages would need to provide two sets of
> > configuration files (for a start).
> Uh, so the reboot to get a newer kernel before the upgrade could possibly fa
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Due to changes in udev 147, squeeze will not support kernels earlier
> than 2.6.27.
> If your packages have code needed to support old kernels, this is the
> right time to clean it up.
No, it isn't. Packages need to support the 2.6.
On 2009-11-10, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> Since it's seeming more and more common for udev to be tied to specific
>> kernel versions, have you considered allowing major versions of udev
>> to be installed in parallel?
> Yes, it would not work because they also tend to be incompatible with
> older conf
On Nov 10, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Since it's seeming more and more common for udev to be tied to specific
> kernel versions, have you considered allowing major versions of udev
> to be installed in parallel?
Yes, it would not work because they also tend to be incompatible with
older configuratio
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:27:16 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:08:08 +0100
> m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
>
> > Due to changes in udev 147, squeeze will not support kernels earlier
> > than 2.6.27.
> >
> > If your packages have code needed to support old kernels, t
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:08:08 +0100
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
> Due to changes in udev 147, squeeze will not support kernels earlier
> than 2.6.27.
>
> If your packages have code needed to support old kernels, this is the
> right time to clean it up.
>
> This means that lenny->squeeze u
25 matches
Mail list logo
