Nico Golde wrote:
>Hi,
>if we would drop some archs now, what is the best way of
>making new packages. Should we just fill in the archs which
>are supported in the future too to hold the load on the
>archs buildds which will be dropped low?
>
>
No. Just leave it as any unless there is a good re
Hallo Adam,
* Adam M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-12 23:09]:
> Nico Golde wrote:
> >if we would drop some archs now, what is the best way of
> >making new packages. Should we just fill in the archs which
> >are supported in the future too to hold the load on the
> >archs buildds which will be dro
* Nico Golde wrote:
> if we would drop some archs now, what is the best way of making new
> packages. Should we just fill in the archs which are supported in
> the future too to hold the load on the archs buildds which will be
> dropped low?
No. It's called proposal because it's not yet decided if
3 matches
Mail list logo
