[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Manoj Srivastava) wrote on 03.05.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>"Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Sendmail configuration is tough but it is also the best documented
> >> MTA bar none!
Raul>> Please don't
On Sun, May 03, 1998 at 11:45:24PM +0400, Amos Shapira wrote:
> |Sendmail configuration is tough but it is also the best documented MTA
> |bar none! The O'Reliey book alone on sendmail is 2 1/5" thick. Probably
> |close to everything that has ever been done with mail has been done with
> |sendma
'From Bill Leach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
I don't see why either but it sure has not been done.
[snip]
> I don't see why it shouldn't be possible to make configuration just
> as easy for a dial-up case. We need to figure out what the typical dial-up
> cases look like and integrate them into the confi
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my opinion, sendmail is well documented *and* has lots of
> documentation. I also fail to find sendmail.cf obfuscatory -- but
> then, I have been writing sendmail.cf files since 1992.
Depends what you're trying to do, I suppose.
When I wan
Hi,
>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sendmail configuration is tough but it is also the best documented
>> MTA bar none!
Raul> Please don't confuse lots of documentation for well documented.
In my opinion, sendmail
On Sun, May 3 1998, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|'From Bill Leach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
|
|Sendmail configuration is tough but it is also the best documented MTA
|bar none! The O'Reliey book alone on sendmail is 2 1/5" thick. Probably
|close to everything that has ever been done with mail has been d
>'From Bill Leach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
>
>I will take a look at sendmail because of Manoj's remarks since the only
>significant disadvantage to sendmail that I could see is that it can be a
>real tough one to set up properly (if you are a continuously connected
>mail server then it is almost a 'sna
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sendmail configuration is tough but it is also the best documented MTA
> bar none!
Please don't confuse lots of documentation for well documented.
In fact, a useful documentation tactic is to alter the program to
make it easier to document.
--
Raul
'From Bill Leach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
Sendmail configuration is tough but it is also the best documented MTA
bar none! The O'Reliey book alone on sendmail is 2 1/5" thick. Probably
close to everything that has ever been done with mail has been done with
sendmail (and possibly some things that c
9 matches
Mail list logo
