>> This require some work from sender's side, how is using plain MUA<->ML
>> interaction. For things like Gmane or reportbug anti-spam rules are
>> customizable and known at least.
>
> While defending against spam is being long enough on user's side [0],
> why not to apply this little addition to s
> This require some work from sender's side, how is using plain MUA<->ML
> interaction. For things like Gmane or reportbug anti-spam rules are
> customizable and known at least.
While defending against spam is being long enough on user's side [0],
why not to apply this little addition to sender's
> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:40:27 +0200
> Maybe is it time to adopt some required tags in the mail subjects to filter
> spamming activities? Something already adopted for the RT system indeed.
I also am thinking about something new in anti-spam case.
While i'm newbie, let me express the idea.
Do
On 7/10/07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Also, why don't we create a meta-package in the BTS for priority
> > changes?
>
> It would actually just be enough to create a set of usertags for
> priori
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Also, why don't we create a meta-package in the BTS for priority
> > changes?
>
> It would actually just be enough to create a set of usertags for
> priority changes, usertag bugs involving priority changes, a
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 06:40:57PM -0500, Anthony Towns wrote:
> We have a bunch of override change requests outstanding, mostly because
> the ftpmaster alias is so absurdly heavily spammed that they get lost in
> the noise;
>
Maybe is it time to adopt some required tags in the mail subjects to
On 7/10/07, Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- reporting illegal dependencies [5] (Anthony said last year that no
one was looking at these; it seems to remain true)
[5] http://ftp-master.debian.org/unmet-deps/
Looks like those are outdated. There is also http://edos.debian.net/
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Also, why don't we create a meta-package in the BTS for priority
> changes?
It would actually just be enough to create a set of usertags for
priority changes, usertag bugs involving priority changes, and then
separate them out.
What it basically needs is
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have a bunch of override change requests outstanding, mostly because
> the ftpmaster alias is so absurdly heavily spammed that they get lost in
> the noise; having more structured checking of priorities/sections that
> someone actually took the time t
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 12:02:32AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > People really do use both package priorities and sections still for
> > selecting packages in the package management tools, and it would be great
> > to have them fixed.
> Seconded. I tried once to install all "optional" packages a
On 09/07/07 at 14:23 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sam Hocevar wrote:
>
> >> The tasks
> >> -
>
> > [...]
>
> > what about override adjustments? I have packages where I've fixed
> > clearly wrong overrides and was answering many times the aut
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sam Hocevar wrote:
>> The tasks
>> -
> [...]
> what about override adjustments? I have packages where I've fixed
> clearly wrong overrides and was answering many times the automatic
> 'override disparity' mails without any answer for years.
S
Sam Hocevar wrote:
> The tasks
> -
[...]
what about override adjustments? I have packages where I've fixed
clearly wrong overrides and was answering many times the automatic
'override disparity' mails without any answer for years.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, C
13 matches
Mail list logo
