This one time, at band camp, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar said:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:47:30PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> >Err, what? Shouldn't they be in contrib? Or do you just mean packages
> >that can use Windows drivers but don't need to?
>
> In the ndiswrapper case, its _only_ purpose is
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:47:30PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>Err, what? Shouldn't they be in contrib? Or do you just mean packages
>that can use Windows drivers but don't need to?
In the ndiswrapper case, its _only_ purpose is to load binary Windows
drivers for the linux kernel.
Aníbal Monsalv
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 03:00:14PM +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> Should we do something about packages in main that load MS Windows
> binary drivers?
Err, what? Shouldn't they be in contrib? Or do you just mean packages
that can use Windows drivers but don't need to?
Cheers,
aj
signa
This one time, at band camp, Michael Poole said:
> Aníbal Monsalve Salazar writes:
>
> > Should we do something about packages in main that load MS Windows
> > binary drivers?
>
> Are there many of these? If there are (as I suspect) just one or two,
> would it hurt to name them? How do you eval
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar writes:
> Should we do something about packages in main that load MS Windows
> binary drivers?
Are there many of these? If there are (as I suspect) just one or two,
would it hurt to name them? How do you evaluate the tradeoff between
someone using Debian with a non-Linux
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 11:52:32AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>Linux in a binary world
>
>What if.. what if the linux kernel developers tomorrow accept that
>binary modules are OK and are essential for the progress of linux.
>[...]
This message from lkml starts the mail thread at:
http://www
6 matches
Mail list logo
