Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is from the linux kernel mailing list. I find it pretty completly sums
> op my thoughts on all the new constitution and voting and policy voting
> stuff that we've been setting up. I haven't been vocal about this, but I
> think we've been moving in the wr
Brent Fulgham writes:
> Witness the latest bloodletting that involved three of the founding
> project members leaving after shouts of "lawsuits" and other hysteria
> against them.
The only mention of lawsuits that I recall was the fear expressed by them
that they might be sued by a third party for
>This is from the linux kernel mailing list. I find it pretty completly sums
>op my thoughts on all the new constitution and voting and policy voting
>stuff that we've been setting up. I haven't been vocal about this, but I
>think we've been moving in the wrong direction.
>
>Of course, this came up
Kai Henningsen wrote:
> Linus is the main developer for Linux. That makes him a good benevolent
> dictator. Debian does not have a main developer; Ian has a political, not
> a technical, job.
Linus's position is just as political as Ian's, it's just not so obvious
because the difference in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joey Hess) wrote on 02.10.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is from the linux kernel mailing list. I find it pretty completly sums
> op my thoughts on all the new constitution and voting and policy voting
> stuff that we've been setting up. I haven't been vocal about this, but
this came up on linux kernel because Linus is showing signs of
burnout - just like Bruce burnt out. The benevolent dicator system isn't
perfect.
- Forwarded message from Larry McVoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry McVoy)
Subject: R
6 matches
Mail list logo