Ladislav Bodnar wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 October 2004 22:15, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > > Just curious: any particular reason why the kernel version is
> > > reported as "100" on
> > > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/allpackages?
> > >
> > > kernel-image-2.6-386 (100)
> > > Linux kernel im
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 22:15, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > Just curious: any particular reason why the kernel version is
> > reported as "100" on
> > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/allpackages?
> >
> > kernel-image-2.6-386 (100)
> > Linux kernel image for version 2.6 on 386.
>
> This
* Ladislav Bodnar wrote:
> Just curious: any particular reason why the kernel version is reported
> as "100" on http://packages.debian.org/unstable/allpackages?
>
> kernel-image-2.6-386 (100)
> Linux kernel image for version 2.6 on 386.
This is just a meta-package, which depends on the latest
3 matches
Mail list logo