Re: KDE hurts Qt (was Re: LICENSES)

1998-10-12 Thread jim
> Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is the really sad part about this whole mess. Qt is a nice > > library. Non-free, but not everything has to be free. But because of > > the refusal of the KDE developers to FIX THE KDE LICENSE PROBLEMS, a > > lot of people are being turned off of

Re: KDE hurts Qt (was Re: LICENSES)

1998-10-10 Thread Raul Miller
Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is the really sad part about this whole mess. Qt is a nice > library. Non-free, but not everything has to be free. But because of > the refusal of the KDE developers to FIX THE KDE LICENSE PROBLEMS, a > lot of people are being turned off of Qt! Qt does

Re: KDE hurts Qt (was Re: LICENSES)

1998-10-10 Thread Joseph Carter
On Fri, Oct 09, 1998 at 11:29:26PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote: > > Now, I won't install Qt even for the parts of KDE I like. > > This is the really sad part about this whole mess. Qt is a nice > library. Non-free, but not everything has to be free. But because of > the refusal of the KDE develop