Keegan Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The Knoppix hard-disk
> installer creates a system that bears little resemblance to the base
> system we all know and love.
Can you please detail this? thx
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:38:38PM +0100, Javier FernÃndez-Sanguino PeÃa
wrote:
> Ummm... You are wrong here. Knoppix (or Knoppix-derived versions) provide
> three things:
> ...
> 4- a system to duplicate this live Cd into hard disk, making the necessary
> changes based on what was auto-detected
> Debian-Jr, Debian-Med, Debian-Edu, Debian-Np, Debian-Lex
Is there a single place where all official Custom Debian Distributions
(CDDs - even a reasonable TLA), aka internal projects, are listed?
> These Custom Distributions use the technique of metapackages and have
> common goals and try to de
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 06:48:20PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> For instance we have defined a term "Package Pools" and everybody now
> knows what we are talking about ...
Of course, not everyone used the term "Package pools" for the same thing
originally.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL P
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Since I evidently didn't, I'm going to spell things out in as much
> boring detail as I can. If I don't end up insulting your intelligence,
> my apologies. :)
You have clarified the situation nicely.
>
> So, using my definitions, the following conclusio
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:55:36AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > Could you please define precisely "flavours" and "derivative distros"?
>
> Damn, I thought I'd already done that.
The problem is that we want to get those "Custom Debian Distributions"
which
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:55:36AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Could you please define precisely "flavours" and "derivative distros"?
Damn, I thought I'd already done that.
Since I evidently didn't, I'm going to spell things out in as much
boring detail as I can. If I don't end up insulting your
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 12:36:37PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> This is right but under the terms we defined in Oslo also your first
> example belongs to this group. The problem is that there was no
> official announcement where "Custom Debian" was *defined*.
These sorts of terms are generally
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Sebastian Ley wrote:
> The idea to integrate Knoppix stuff back to Debian also occured to me. I
> am glad to hear that Klaus likes the idea too. Have you put any further
> thought into the question how to accomplish that?
The only thing I did besides talking about it was creat
9 matches
Mail list logo
