On Saturday 30 January 1999, at 16 h 41, the keyboard of Paul Seelig
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, let's be serious again: unfortunately this actually means that
> some of the most obvious installation profiles of slink stay to be
> unnecessarily bloated.
Giving the size of the current pro
Jonathan P Tomer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>a possibility i considered: divide user-space...packages into
>heirarchical groups (structure identical or similar to the debian
>menus, possibly?). have a level wherein the user selects any of these
>he wants; it will be easy to skip those things he
> Might it be possible to include fewer packages in each profile and then
> present the user with a list of additional packages that might be of
> interest to them given that they have chosen this particular profile?
> Something like "You have installed the Scientific Workstation profile. The
> fo
Paul Seelig writes:
> Myself i do prefer XEmacs over all other variants but wouldn't mind if
> i had to install it later on my own.
I prefer emacs, bu I also wouldn't mind if > i had to install it later on
my own. In fact, I would not mind at all if emacs was optional.
> IMHO it would be much wi
> [ redundant emacs versions ]
> > Well, I'll suggest that for potato. It will start a nice flame-war on
> > debian-devel "emacs vs. xemacs".
> >
> Hey, that's just what we need at this stage for *slink*! >:-)
>
> Okay, let's be serious again: unfortunately this actually means that
> some of th
5 matches
Mail list logo
