2013/7/22 Raphael Hertzog :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>> I want the process to be something like:
>>
>> - New PPAMAIN
>> - Upload new package
>> - "NMU" packages to work with the new stuff (this needs to be
>> something that the project is OK with) inside the
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> I want the process to be something like:
>
> - New PPAMAIN
> - Upload new package
> - "NMU" packages to work with the new stuff (this needs to be
> something that the project is OK with) inside the PPA
> - Fiddle
> - Push it back up
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:22:37 +0200
Zlatan Todoric wrote:
> For me, unstable
> or experimental should be *just do it* and develop it so Debian gains
> momentum (or
> some other nice solution to gain that).
Coordination is always the problem. Developers cannot just go and break
everything for othe
Heyya, Michael,
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 05:42:35PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
>
> I do see that some innovative ideas cause breakage. And sometimes breaking
> things may result in progress. All I was saying is that innovation and
> breaking
> things are not the same.
Granted. I 100% agree.
Hi Paul, hi all,
> Ahoy, fellow developers,
>
>
> Having followed the recent threads, I've been growing concerned - not of
> sticking with an old init system, or switching to a new one, or even the
> god-aweful tone of every damn post on that thread (srsly guise).
>
> I'm mostly concerned that
Ahoy,
I am not active in Debian development much but I do observe it closely and
must
say that Debian needs innovation a lot - not for purpose to innovate but
there are
so much talented people with great ideas that just need to *explode*. For
me, unstable
or experimental should be *just do it* and
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:39:54PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > I feel the subject of this thread is not very well aligned with your
> > reasoning -
> > I don't think innovation==breaking things!? At least for myself the init
> > system
>
> I very much disagree.
>
>
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:39:54PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> [...]
>
> I feel the subject of this thread is not very well aligned with your
> reasoning -
> I don't think innovation==breaking things!? At least for myself the init
> system
I very much disagree.
"Without deviation fro
8 matches
Mail list logo
