On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 02:16:34PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Daniel Walrond writes:
>
> > As per policy 10.9 - Permissions and owners[0], opensmtpd requires
> > some system users for running non-root-privileged processes. I propose
> > to user the following dynamic accounts; opensmtpd, opensmt
+++ Colin Watson [2013-05-22 22:55 +0100]:
> > * Append "Debian-" to the username, as in Debian-opensmtpd
>
> This was used by Debian-exim and not a lot else that I ever heard of.
> In my view this scheme rightly failed; plenty of simple system
> monitoring tools (top, ps, and the like) truncate l
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 02:16:34PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> We currently have no good policy about how to name system users, but
> despite that I personally would recommend against using simple
> alphanumeric usernames like those. (They are longer than eight
> characters, which avoids some loc
Daniel Walrond writes:
> As per policy 10.9 - Permissions and owners[0], opensmtpd requires
> some system users for running non-root-privileged processes. I propose
> to user the following dynamic accounts; opensmtpd, opensmtpq, opensmtpf.
> Also I will be co-maintaining this package with Ryan K
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:13:18PM +0100, Daniel Walrond wrote:
> As per policy 10.9 - Permissions and owners[0], opensmtpd requires
> some system users for running non-root-privileged processes. I propose
> to user the following dynamic accounts; opensmtpd, opensmtpq, opensmtpf.
Thanks for CCing
Hello,
As per policy 10.9 - Permissions and owners[0], opensmtpd requires
some system users for running non-root-privileged processes. I propose
to user the following dynamic accounts; opensmtpd, opensmtpq, opensmtpf.
Also I will be co-maintaining this package with Ryan Kavanagh, who has
already
6 matches
Mail list logo
