* Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-17 14:37]:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:07:51AM +0100, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> > This provides a unified and easy to use interface to modern PDF sets. It
> > is designed to work not only with individual PDF sets but also with the
> > more rece
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 10:37:13AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > You can use any of the X-Debbugs-... headers in the psuedoheaders,
> > but they must be prefixed with X-Debbugs-. The converse is not true.
>
> Sorry, I got lost here. Is the
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 10:37:13AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> You can use any of the X-Debbugs-... headers in the psuedoheaders,
> but they must be prefixed with X-Debbugs-. The converse is not true.
Sorry, I got lost here. Is the converse 'non-prefixed non-x-debbugs
headers cannot be used' ?
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Luca Capello wrote:
> Never tested, but FWIU in the page I linked [1], you can use the
> pseudo-headers [2]. So, again, never tested, something like the
> following should do the work:
> =
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ITP foo -- a bar viewer
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 17 Januar 2007 12:34 schrieb Luca Capello:
>> Please the next time use the X-Debbugs-CC: header [1] instead of
[...]
> Will b.d.o accept those headers in the first lines of a mail body?
Yes (at least, it should).
See #179340 against debbugs, currently flagged
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:07:51AM +0100, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> This provides a unified and easy to use interface to modern PDF sets. It
> is designed to work not only with individual PDF sets but also with the
> more recent multiple "error" sets.
Could you please explain what a PDF is in thi
Hello!
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:24:53 +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> * Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-17 13:17]:
>
>> Will b.d.o accept those headers in the first lines of a mail body?
>> E.g. reportbug and kmail do not really work together (one of them
>> must get smarter) and I didn
Am Mittwoch 17 Januar 2007 13:24 schrieb Martin Wuertele:
> * Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-17 13:17]:
> > Will b.d.o accept those headers in the first lines of a mail body?
> > E.g. reportbug and kmail do not really work together (one of them must
> > get smarter) and I didn't find
* Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-17 13:17]:
> Will b.d.o accept those headers in the first lines of a mail body?
> E.g. reportbug and kmail do not really work together (one of them must get
> smarter) and I didn't find a way to add custom headers for the _current_ mail
> only in km
Am Mittwoch 17 Januar 2007 12:34 schrieb Luca Capello:
> Please the next time use the X-Debbugs-CC: header [1] instead of
> directly writing to d-d so the ITP will be sent to debian-devel only
> after a number has been assigned to the bug (and if any one wants to
> answer to the bug, he doesn't nee
Hello!
Please the next time use the X-Debbugs-CC: header [1] instead of
directly writing to d-d so the ITP will be sent to debian-devel only
after a number has been assigned to the bug (and if any one wants to
answer to the bug, he doesn't need to search for the correct bug
number).
On Wed, 17 Ja
11 matches
Mail list logo
