>>"John" == John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> First of all, I doubt that you're going to have too much
John> trouble getting a response from SElinux. They've been pretty
John> good on responding to their mailinglist
I had sent in an informal request for clarification to the
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:12, John Galt wrote:
> First of all, I doubt that you're going to have too much trouble getting a
> response from SElinux. They've been pretty good on responding to their
> mailinglist: which, I might add, I see more than one Debian Developer has
> contributed to, yet you ha
First of all, I doubt that you're going to have too much trouble getting a
response from SElinux. They've been pretty good on responding to their
mailinglist: which, I might add, I see more than one Debian Developer has
contributed to, yet you have not. It would behoove you to actually look
as i
Russell Coker wrote:
> I intend to package the kernel patch for NSA Security Enhanced Linux.
> Below is all the details on licenses. My interpretation of the below license
> details (copied from the web site) is that the kernel patch is under the GPL
> and everything is fine.
> However is the
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 05:36:26PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> > I intend to package the kernel patch for NSA Security Enhanced Linux.
> >
> > Below is all the details on licenses. My interpretation of the below
> > license
> > details (copie
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 05:36:26PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> I intend to package the kernel patch for NSA Security Enhanced Linux.
>
> Below is all the details on licenses. My interpretation of the below license
> details (copied from the web site) is that the kernel patch is under the GPL
6 matches
Mail list logo
