"Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It doesn't sound good for me. Let's consider fglrx driver. I would like
> to stay tuned with fglrx from Debian package. But sometimes I have a
> problems running an OpenGL application. In such cases I use an flgrx
> directly from ATI to verify if
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[cut]
> > Is the only way to make sure that conffiles do not clutter filesystem to
> > remove them in maintainer's script on upgrade from previous version?
> I believe that's the case, although I'd like to g
[Russ Allbery]
>> Is the only way to make sure that conffiles do not clutter filesystem to
>> remove them in maintainer's script on upgrade from previous version?
>
> I believe that's the case, although I'd like to get some confirmation
> before adding something to Policy 10.7.3 about this. See Bu
"Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, why it still exists? I read Debian Policy, section 10.7.3[1] but it
> does not say what shall happen if after upgrade of the package it does
> not provide conffile anymore.
>
> Is the only way to make sure that conffiles do not clutter filesy
Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
>
> Is the only way to make sure that conffiles do not clutter filesystem to
> remove them in maintainer's script on upgrade from previous version?
That's correct. The only way currently to remove obsolete conffiles is
to do it manually in the maintainer scripts [1]
I
5 matches
Mail list logo
