Re: Re: Handling bugs properly

2008-04-18 Thread Filipus Klutiero
What is an ordinary bug submitter's recourse when a bug report is closed without resolution? The response sent to the poster is that a reasonable response must have been received (or a paraphrase); what happens then the response is missing? The exact phrasing is Their explanatio

Re: Re: Handling bugs properly (Was: Bug#474964: ...)

2008-04-18 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Closing valid bugs which were merely assigned to the wrong package isn't acceptable (though admitedly, it *is* better than just ignoring them entirely.) Closing a valid bug without fixing is generally wrong, like in this case, whether there is enough manpower to treat it or not. And if you have

Re: Handling bugs properly (Was: Bug#474964: ...)

2008-04-18 Thread Filipus Klutiero
I want to hear your opinion about the following question: If you think a bug does not belong to your package, do you think it is your duty as a maintainer to reassign to bug to the package it belongs to or do you think just closing the bug is fine? Closing a report merely because it is assigned

Re: Handling bugs properly

2008-04-18 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > What is an ordinary bug submitter's recourse when a bug report is > closed without resolution? Reopen the bug once with more information, then if it's closed again without resolution, contact -devel or similar if they're convinced that it's a bug whic

Re: Handling bugs properly (Was: Bug#474964: ...)

2008-04-18 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote: If anybody would confirm that this problem might belong to module-init-tools I would volunteer to take over the job of proper reassignment - but I just don't know exactly and "my experts in questions like this" just refuse proper communication. See #4

Re: Handling bugs properly

2008-04-18 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:18:52 -0700, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Closing valid bugs which were merely assigned to the wrong package > isn't acceptable My sentiments as well. > That said, as a submitter, you don't need to reopen the bug to > reassign it, and playing reopen g

Re: Handling bugs properly (Was: Bug#474964: ...)

2008-04-18 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 02:40:47PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: [...] > On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 I filed #474964 against linux-2.6: > Loads pcspkr and others even if explicitely excluded in modprobe.conf [...] > If anybody would confirm that this problem might belong to module-init-tools > I would vol

Re: Handling bugs properly (Was: Bug#474964: ...)

2008-04-18 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Andreas Tille wrote: > I want to hear your opinion about the following question: If you > think a bug does not belong to your package, do you think it is your > duty as a maintainer to reassign to bug to the package it belongs to > or do you think just closing the bug is fine?