On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 04:13:20AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:00:28AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:14:17AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > > On 11012 March 1977, Nico Golde wrote:
>
> > > > would it be a big change
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:00:28AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:14:17AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > On 11012 March 1977, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > would it be a big change for dak to enable that sponsors of
> > Yes. And not only for dak. Just - tell me how the scri
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:14:17AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11012 March 1977, Nico Golde wrote:
>
> > would it be a big change for dak to enable that sponsors of
>
> Yes. And not only for dak. Just - tell me how the script should find out
> who the sponsor was/is?
I might be mistaken, bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/07/2007 08:28 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 08 May 2007, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> Pick a random uid? Send no mail? Send mail to all? And no, simply
>> "pick @debian.org" doesnt work, people may have chosen to deactivate
>> that address becaus
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 01:18:11AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11013 March 1977, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> >> This would need a new field defined in some sane way and then get
> >> enforced to use to make sense. And then the scripts can start using it.
> >> So the simple(r) option is "subsc
On Tue, 08 May 2007, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Pick a random uid? Send no mail? Send mail to all? And no, simply
> "pick @debian.org" doesnt work, people may have chosen to deactivate
> that address because they use something different for all their
> debian activity now.
It's slightly suboptimal, bu
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 01:18:11AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11013 March 1977, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> >> This would need a new field defined in some sane way and then get
> >> enforced to use to make sense. And then the scripts can start using it.
> >> So the simple(r) option is "sub
On 11013 March 1977, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>> This would need a new field defined in some sane way and then get
>> enforced to use to make sense. And then the scripts can start using it.
>> So the simple(r) option is "subscribe to pts".
> Doesn't the key used to sign the upload tell you?
Yes,
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:14:17AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11012 March 1977, Nico Golde wrote:
>
> > would it be a big change for dak to enable that sponsors of
>
> Yes. And not only for dak. Just - tell me how the script should find out
> who the sponsor was/is?
>
> This would need a n
Hi,
* Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-08 00:16]:
> On 11012 March 1977, Nico Golde wrote:
>
> > would it be a big change for dak to enable that sponsors of
>
> Yes. And not only for dak. Just - tell me how the script should find out
> who the sponsor was/is?
I thought this migh work v
On 11012 March 1977, Nico Golde wrote:
> would it be a big change for dak to enable that sponsors of
Yes. And not only for dak. Just - tell me how the script should find out
who the sponsor was/is?
This would need a new field defined in some sane way and then get
enforced to use to make sense. A
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:14:52PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:10:47PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:08:09PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > This would be nice since the NM don't have to forward them
> > > to the sponsor.
> >
> > H
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:17:38PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:14:52PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Honestly, that sucks. I don't want to subscribe the PTS for packages I
> > sponsor, I do go read the BTS from time to time to check they (my
> > sponsoring)
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:14:52PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Honestly, that sucks. I don't want to subscribe the PTS for packages I
> sponsor, I do go read the BTS from time to time to check they (my
> sponsoring) are doing a good job, but I don't want to receive
> everything. Though, I fin
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:10:47PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:08:09PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > This would be nice since the NM don't have to forward them
> > to the sponsor.
>
> Have them subscribe in the PTS?
Honestly, that sucks. I don't want to subsc
Hi,
* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-07 21:31]:
> On Mon, 7 May 2007, Nico Golde wrote:
>
> >This won't work for the initial mails you get when you
> >upload the package the first time.
>
> What about using the Uploaders control field?
I don't want to be listed as co-maintainer for a
On Mon, 7 May 2007, Nico Golde wrote:
This won't work for the initial mails you get when you
upload the package the first time.
What about using the Uploaders control field?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Hi,
* Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-07 20:12]:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:08:09PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > This would be nice since the NM don't have to forward them
> > to the sponsor.
>
> Have them subscribe in the PTS?
This won't work for the initial mails you get wh
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:08:09PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> This would be nice since the NM don't have to forward them
> to the sponsor.
Have them subscribe in the PTS?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
19 matches
Mail list logo
