2018-08-13 04:25 Paul Wise:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 1:19 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
2018-07-30 22:36 Adrian Bunk:
And the next burden will be if riscv64 gets added in bullseye.
[*] Unlike other arches, this one is not restricted to a single vendor
so hardware can be annouced
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 1:19 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> 2018-07-30 22:36 Adrian Bunk:
>>
>> And the next burden will be if riscv64 gets added in bullseye.
>
> [*] Unlike other arches, this one is not restricted to a single vendor
>so hardware can be annouced at any time from une
2018-07-30 22:36 Adrian Bunk:
And the next burden will be if riscv64 gets added in bullseye.
Not likely, I think, since for example there's almost no hardware
available for end-users to buy (or to use for buildds), and this will
probably be the case at least until the freeze [*].
Another reas
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 05:59:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>...
> - armel: The armv4t default isn't used very much anymore,
The baseline is armv5te since last year.
> and we had issues in the past.
Could you elaborate on that?
The latest major issue I am aware of was about #727621 and the
On 2018-07-16 17:59:28 [+0200], Matthias Klose wrote:
> architectures. Some notes on other candidates for release architectures:
>
> - armel: The armv4t default isn't used very much anymore, and we had
>issues in the past.
Would things get better with armv5te as default or is the lack of FP
5 matches
Mail list logo
